What Makes Counseling Effective?:
Is it the wand or way the magician waves it that creates the magic?
As
a counselor educator, I found the linked review below appropriate as we begin
another academic year. With a new cadre for “future counselors” populating our
classes, it is easy to
become myopic in our approach to counselor education and disproportionately attend to “the theory of counseling,” with all its associated erudite foci, and inadvertently relegate the “practice of counseling” to an “also ran” category in our pedagogy. The review is of an article that indirectly revisits an old topic, one familiar to most counselor educators, namely, the importance of the relationship to an efficacious outcome in counseling.
become myopic in our approach to counselor education and disproportionately attend to “the theory of counseling,” with all its associated erudite foci, and inadvertently relegate the “practice of counseling” to an “also ran” category in our pedagogy. The review is of an article that indirectly revisits an old topic, one familiar to most counselor educators, namely, the importance of the relationship to an efficacious outcome in counseling.
Although
the “Four Common Factors” of counseling are not the focus of the article, I
could not help but flash back to the significance of these determinants of
counseling outcome as I read the review, in particular the significance of the
therapeutic alliance or what we so often refer to as the “relationship” between
the practitioner and the individual being treated—Hans Beihl wrote an
interesting essay on this in his review of the findings of Task Force on
Evidence-Based Therapy Relationships commissioned by the American
Psychological Association – see http://bit.ly/1eaPSLW.
In
any event, this is not intended to be an essay, but an invitation to “review
the review” linked below as it gave me pause to consider what the issue of
primacy “should be” when training the entering “next generation of professional
counselors”…and provides me with further pause to consider just how I can best
teach this…can I teach empathy? As I consider my role as a counselor educator,
I find myself realizing that much of what I learned about “effective counseling”
came at my grandfather’s knee rather than in a graduate school classroom. Like
Fulghum wrote in Everything I needed to know I learned in kindergarten,
it is the basic principles of the “Golden Rule” that serve as the glue that
binds practitioner and client in an effective therapeutic relationship…or as
Pancho Sanza sings when asked why he stays with Don Quixote as his “squire” in The
Man of La Mancha, “I like him; I simply like him…”
Enjoy…and
ponder
Dr. Robert
For more on the significance of the practitioner is affecting treatment outcome consider:
For more on the significance of the practitioner is affecting treatment outcome consider:
Treatment: staff do matter
(click to visit article)
|
For most research, the impact
of the therapist is noise in the system – a nuisance to be adjusted out of
the analysis in order to focus on the therapy. This risks sacrificing what
matters for what so often does not, so we stretched our hot topics to an
issue which arguably ought to be sizzling in the research, offering a
reminder of lessons from the past and from general psychotherapy.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thoughtful comments, alternate points of view, and/or questions are welcomed.